Learning / Education

The use of scale models in the education of architects has a chequered past. Despite their documented use in the Middle Ages, through the Renaissance, and Leon Battista Alberti’s (1404-1772) praise of the scale model and instructions to use scale models to communicate and refine an architectural proposal, it was not part of the first codified architectural curriculum. This would become the École des Beaux-Arts established in Paris and exported throughout the world. The influence of that school would marginalise the use of models in education for nearly two centuries. And, yet, outside of formal education there were models aplenty in the 18th and 19th centuries as part of apprenticeships; Sir John Soane’s (1753-1837) collection being a notable example that was also used for training purposes.

Alternative approaches to educating architects, most notably the system of education devised at the Bauhaus, set up in opposition to the Beaux-Arts approach, celebrated the model as a creative tool as well as a representational device. From 1923, the Bauhaus also deployed the model as a prototype linked to industrial design and design collaboration. Upon its forced closure, former Bauhaus educators took the model with them to schools and universities across Europe, North America, the Middle East, and Japan. Post-war higher education reforms, including the evolution of polytechnics, helped propel the model as a centrepiece in design education and practice.

Computer-aided design saw a decline in physical model-making in the 1980s and 1990s in favour of virtual models and renderings, which were made possible by new drafting and modelling software. Some architecture programmes and offices proposed paperless studios, dispensing with hand-drawing and physical modelling altogether. Development of digital fabrication technologies has in the last two decades brought all types of tactile models, including handmade models, back to learning and education. This was not just within architecture schools, but more widely across the humanities and sciences from fine art to engineering to medical training. The model increasingly features in primary and secondary education, both as a learning prop and as shop-based skill-set development, not to mention the building block sets and educational model-toys used throughout early childhood development.

Contemporary and emerging model types can combine analogue, digital, and robotically constructed components. They can include motors for kinetic effects and atmospheric lighting, audio, video and scanning technologies. Models are increasingly smart objects, keyed into data sets and sensors. Many play with scale, detail, and offer interactive kit-of-parts elements. The differences between study models and final iterations are ebbing away. As learning and education objectives shift and specialise, so do models.

Case Study: ‘Friedrich Kurrent’s Spatial Models at TU Munich’

Dr Mark Morris

Between 1973 and 1996 Prof. Friedrich Kurrent and his assistants built around 300 models together with their students at the chair “Entwerfen, Raumgestaltung und Sakralbau” (now called Chair of Spatial Arts and Lighting Design) at the Technical University in Munich. Over the span of more than two decades their research into housing examined notable projects from the past 200 years, including well-known projects by Le Corbusier, Rudolph Schindler, Frank Lloyd Wright and Adolf Loos as well as vernacular buildings and a few churches; built and unbuilt.

Friedrich Kurrent, an architect from Vienna who had been part of the Austrian architectural group Arbeitsgruppe 4, was interested in structural experimentation as well as historical architecture long before postmodern became a buzzword in architectural circles in the 1980s. The models were built as part of the studio work under the supervision of Wolfgang Wannieck who ran the model workshop. According to Friedrich Kurrent, the most important feature was that every model could be disassembled. All models were constructed at the large scale 1:33 1/3 to depict the interiors at a size detailed enough to analyze and compare them. Yet, wood and cardboard models remain relatively abstract and there is no indication of building materials or context. The models were photographed in beautiful black and white images by Franz Wimmer that reinforce the emphasis on abstract spaces and focus attention on the most important aspects of the design.

The models were meant as a study tool for students to examine the relationship between inside and outside and to develop skills in spatial thinking. The first that were built were designs by Adolf Loos, whose work Kurrent had rediscovered while he was studying in Vienna and whose drawings he had brought to Munich.

The accurate information needed for all other models often came from his assistants and from colleagues in the United States, which made it possible to draw the plans for the models. Students had to take the model apart during their exam to explain and analyze the spatial layout of the buildings. Appropriately, a 1996 publication featuring the models was called “Raummodelle”—spatial models. While Friedrich Kurrent’s models are now at the archive of the Architekturmuseum der TUM, the current head of the chair, Hannelore Deubzer, is continuing the tradition of making spatial models with a focus on buildings by Louis Kahn.

Images: Adolf Loos, Haus Steiner, 1910, Model 1:33 1/3
Model makers: Anton Dollinger, Stefan Korinski
Model photographer: Franz Wimmer
© Architekturmuseum der TUM

Bibliography:

  • Brosterman, Inventing Kindergarten (New York, 1997)
  • Bunch, A Core Curriculum in Architectural Education (San Francisco, 1993)
  • A Caragonne, The Texas Rangers, Notes from the Architectural Underground (Cambridge, 1995)
  • Crinson and J. Lubbock, Architecture – Art of Profession? Three Hundred Years of Architectural Education in Britain(Manchester, 1994)
  • Dorey, ‘Sir John Soane’s Model Room’, Perspecta 41 (2008), 46, 26, 92-93, 170-171.
  • A Drexler, The Architecture of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts (London, 1977)
  • Elsner, ‘A Collector’s Model of Desire: The House and Museum of Sir John Soane’, in J. Elsner and R. Cardinal eds., The Cultures of Collecting (London, 1994) pp.155-176.
  • Frampton and S. Kolbowski, eds., Idea as Model (New York, 1980)
  • Kentgens-Craig, The Bauhaus and America: First Contacts 1919-1936 (Cambridge, 1999)
  • Leslie, ‘Inside Outside: Changing Attitudes Towards Architectural Models in the Museums at South Kensington’, Architectural History, 47 (2004), 159-200.
  • Amanda Lillie and Mauro Mussolin, ‘The Wooden Models of Palazzo Strozzi as Flexible Instruments in the Design Process’, in Amedeo Belluzzi, Caroline Elam, Francesco Paolo Fiore, eds. Giuliano da Sangallo (Milan, 2017) pp.210–229.
  • A. Millon, ‘Models in Renaissance Architecture,’ in H. A. Millon and V. Magnago Lampugnani, eds., Italian Renaissance Architecture: from Brunelleschi to Michelangelo. (London: 1994; reprinted w/o catalogue 1996)
  • Morris, Models: Architecture and the Miniature (London, 2006)
  • Pollack, The Education of the Architect: Historiography, Urbanism and the Growth of Architectural Knowledge(Cambridge, 1997)
  • Porter and J. Neale, Architectural Supermodels (London, 2000)
  • Valeriani, ‘Three-dimensional Models as ‘in-between-objects’: The Creation of in-between Knowledge in Early Modern Architectural Practice’, History of Technology 31 (2011) 26-46.
  • Wilton-Ely, ‘The Architectural Models of Sir John Soane: A Catalogue’, Architectural History 12 (1969) 5-38 + 81-101.

Leave a Reply